Premium financing is an arrangement in which the policy owner borrows from a bank or other lender to pay part or all of a life insurance premium, and assigns all or part of the rights under the policy to the lender as collateral. It is not part of the insurance product but a loan secured on the policy. Participating policies are often used for financing because they have a cash value that can be valued; but a substantial part of that cash value is non-guaranteed bonus, and this is exactly what sets financing a participating policy apart from other secured loans. For the general regulatory rules in both markets, see our sister site vul.hk. This page covers only the three kinds of mismatch specific to participating policies, and how readers should test for them before signing.

Applies to: Hong Kong, Singapore. Where source-of-funds and foreign exchange questions for Mainland residents are involved, please obtain professional advice in your own jurisdiction. This page does not offer any view on interest rates, loan-to-value ratios or approval outcomes.

The regulatory baseline: Hong Kong IA standards and Singapore bank practice

Hong Kong: after consulting the HKMA, the IA issued a circular on supervisory standards for premium financing on 1 April 2022, effective 1 January 2023. Insurers must confirm that the customer can (a) pay the non-financed part of the premium, (b) repay the loan over its full term, and (c) repay if the lender demands early repayment; if early repayment could only be met from the surrender value, there is deemed to be a risk of over-leverage. Evidence of assets must be verified and subject to a reasonable haircut, and a self-occupied property is generally not accepted. The Important Facts Statement – Premium Financing (IFS-PF) must be signed before the policy is issued, and the effect of financing on the right to cancel during the GL29 cooling-off period must be explained. The IA–HKMA joint inspection findings published on 27 June 2024 found that some lending banks assessed credit only on the customer's ability to pay monthly interest, and that some IFS-PFs had not been completed before the policy was issued.

Singapore: as of October 2026, no dedicated circular on premium financing from MAS or LIA has been found; terms depend on bank credit policy, general fair dealing requirements and the insurer's assignment rules. A report in The Straits Times of 22 July 2022 (republished by NTU) noted that such loans in Singapore are mostly at floating rates, often pegged to short-term benchmarks; this is a media report, not a regulatory position.

These rules govern sales and credit procedures; they do not assess the volatility of participating bonuses themselves. The three risks below are what needs to be tested separately when financing a participating policy.

Mismatch 1: with a fulfilment ratio below 100%, collateral value grows more slowly than illustrated

The benefit illustration of a participating policy shows non-guaranteed bonuses under the "best estimate" scenario, and financing calculations often use it to estimate when the policy value will cover the loan principal and interest. Hong Kong's fulfilment ratios provide the historical evidence against which this assumption can be tested: a fulfilment ratio is the average ratio of non-guaranteed bonuses actually declared to bonuses illustrated at the point of sale, annual dividends, reversionary bonuses and terminal bonuses must be disclosed separately, and insurers update the figures on their websites by 30 June each year (GL16 interpretation notes, paras 2.1, 2.8 and 4.6). The Hong Kong fulfilment ratio index compiled by third-party actuarial consultancy Milliman shows the industry-level figure falling from 90% in reporting year 2023 to 89% in reporting year 2024 (published 1 May 2026; not official IA data; past performance does not indicate future results).

The implication for financing is that every point by which the fulfilment ratio falls short of 100% means actual growth in policy value falls short of the projection by that much, while loan interest keeps accruing under the contract as usual. The HKMA's consumer guidance lists both risks together: non-guaranteed benefits "may be lower than that shown in the benefit illustration", and an "interest rate hike may cause financial loss". When both happen at once, the gap between the policy value and the loan balance widens faster than with either alone.

Mismatch 2: with a high share of terminal bonus, the lender's valuation may be more conservative

The cash value of a participating policy is usually made up of the guaranteed cash value, the cash value of reversionary bonuses and the terminal bonus. Taking the public brochure of a Hong Kong participating savings plan as an example, reversionary and terminal bonuses each have a "face value" and a "cash value", the cash value is what is paid on surrender, and the example terms state that the two may not be equal; terminal bonus is only actually settled on surrender, claim or maturity, and can be adjusted before it is declared. The guide to participating policies from LIA and MoneySENSE in Singapore likewise explains that a reversionary bonus becomes part of the guaranteed benefits once added but is paid only at its cash value on surrender, while terminal bonus is not guaranteed until it is paid.

Therefore, how the lender values the policy — counting only the guaranteed cash value, or including part of the reversionary and terminal bonuses, and at what discount — is decided by the lender under its own credit policy and written into the facility letter. The higher a policy's share of terminal bonus, the wider the gap may be between the "total cash value" in the benefit illustration and the collateral value the lender recognises. Before signing, ask the lender to set out its valuation basis in writing, and check it yourself against the split between guaranteed and non-guaranteed amounts in the benefit illustration.

Mismatch 3: bonuses are declared once a year, but a top-up call can come at any time

The bonuses on a participating policy are smoothed and declared by the insurer's board once a year; the very purpose of smoothing is to stop bonuses moving with the market day to day. A loan is different: under the valuation frequency and ratios agreed in the facility letter, the lender can call for additional collateral or early repayment when the collateral value falls short, interest rates rise or its own policy tightens. This creates a mismatch in timing — the policy value is adjusted once a year, while pressure to repay can arise at any moment.

Being forced to surrender in these circumstances carries a threefold cost: cash values in the early policy years are usually below premiums paid; terminal bonus is settled only at its cash value at the time of surrender, giving up future accumulation; and surrendering after a bonus cut locks in a lower terminal bonus. Item (c) of the affordability assessment under the IA standards — repayment if the lender demands it early — tests exactly this scenario.

Stress tests before signing, and restrictions after assignment

It is advisable to put the following tests into written correspondence rather than relying on verbal explanations:

Test Question to ask
Fulfilment ratio scenario Recalculated using the fulfilment ratios of the product series' weaker years (rather than 100%), when does the policy value cover the loan principal and interest?
Valuation basis Which bonuses does the lender count, at what discount, and is terminal bonus included?
Interest rate scenario If rates rise by a few percentage points, how do interest costs compare with growth in policy value?
Early repayment If repayment is demanded in policy year 3, 5 or 10, how large is the shortfall based on the guaranteed cash value at that time?
Currency If the loan currency differs from the policy currency, who bears the exchange rate risk?

Once the policy is assigned, some rights that belonged to the policy owner can be exercised only with the lender's consent. The HKMA points out that, without the financial institution's approval, the customer "will not be able to exercise the rights that are assigned to the financial institution". Effects relevant to other topics on this site include: cancellation during the free-look period (21 calendar days in Hong Kong, 14 days in Singapore) may require the lender's consent; the example terms state that a change of life assured must be signed by the assignee; a policy split or currency conversion changes the structure of the collateral and generally requires the lender's written consent; and in Singapore a revocable nomination is revoked by assignment, while in Hong Kong using a policy that forms a trust under section 13 of the Married Persons Status Ordinance as collateral may raise enforcement issues (see Policy split and change of life assured and Legacy planning).

Approval and terms for premium financing are decided by the lender. If you would like this interpreted for your own circumstances, you can register your needs through the contact details on this site.

Sources and dates

  1. Circular on the supervisory standards and key requirements on the use of premium financing to take out long term insurance policies — Insurance Authority (IA), Hong Kong (copy in the HKMA document repository) · 2022-04-01
  2. Findings from IA-HKMA joint inspection exercise on premium financing — Insurance Authority (IA) / Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) · 2024-06-27
  3. Premium Financing (Smart Consumers) — Hong Kong Monetary Authority (HKMA) · 2024-01-24
  4. 某香港保险公司储蓄分红寿险产品小册子(仅作条款结构示例,非推荐;印刷编号尾号 2608)(Product brochure for a Hong Kong insurer's participating savings plan; cited only as an example of policy structure, not a recommendation; print code ending 2608) — Public document of a Hong Kong insurer · 2026-08
  5. Your Guide to Participating Policies — LIA Singapore / MoneySENSE · 2020-05
  6. Interpretation Notes – GL16: Fulfillment Ratios & Historical Crediting Interest Rates — Insurance Authority (IA), Hong Kong (copy hosted by Kennedys) · 2023-02
  7. Why borrowing money to fund insurance policies can prove detrimental — The Straits Times (republished by NTU) · 2022-07-22
  8. The Milliman Fulfillment Ratio Index (Reporting year 2024) — Milliman (actuarial consultancy, unofficial) · 2026-05-01